Monday, November 28, 2016

Proof of Human Induced Climate Change

All the Global Warming models said that the natural result of CO2 rising at 2 parts per million per year should have been temperatures rising significantly over the last 19 years, but instead, temperatures have been flat! There has been no global warming! Therefore, given that Global Warming exists ... as a natural result of CO2 increase, the fact that all the models predicting global warming have been wrong ... constitutes unequivocal proof of human tampering with climate to hide Global Warming.

Now that we see there is a conspiracy powerful enough to halt Global Warming, is it any wonder why Michael Mann had to use fudged data and a fudged algorithm to create the hockey stick chart in order to get the policies we need to halt Global Warming? Is it any wonder why defenders of science had to bypass peer review and block others from reproducing Mann's results for as long as possible?

Clearly climate denial is a vast alt-right conspiracy lead by Donald Trump in America and headed by Vladimir Putin.

EndOfInnocence.com is the best example of those sites that hide their true motives by never supporting Trump or Putin. It even tries to teach people to think for themselves instead of believing the experts! It is thus sites like EndOfInnocence.com that pose the greatest threat to our New World Order.

Friday, November 25, 2016

I Work for Putin?!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/washington-post-names-drudge-zero-hedge-anti-clinton-sophisticated-russian-propagand

The Washington Post informs me that I am being played by Putin.

Bullshit! I’m not being played! I am one of the players!

It’s not just me. It’s the whole liberty movement. We all work for Putin (the former KGB agent). The socialists and progressives see right through us because they obviously have such a firm grasp on reality. That’s why they agree with their leader, Hillary Clinton, who says we are all deplorable and irredeemable. In other words, we are less than human – like how everyone sees cannibals – like how their great grand father saw his famly’s slaves – and how their grand father saw Jews … So in touch with reality they are.

I was not aware of some of these sites, so I would like to say “Thanks!” to the Washington Post for telling me so many sites where I can find the truth. Saves me lots of time.

Although EndOfInnocence.com is not explicitly mentioned on their enemies list, many of the sites listed are on the same page as EndOfInnocence on most issues. Some of them are in the list of recommended sites on EndOfInnocence. In fact, many of them are less extreme than EndOfInnocence. Therefore, my main concern is … What am I doing wrong?! How do I get on that list?!

On a more serious note, at least one of these sites (Paul Craig Roberts) is indeed anti-American and pro-Russian. It is a fake anti-establishment site. It is a Psyop, but it is far more likely to be CIA than Russian. It uses real conspiracies as bait while trying to make Americans feel bad about being Americans and while subtley promoting big government. It is like a sneakier version of the socialist and progressive sites.

While I am being serious, why would the Washington Post, which vies with the NYT to be the most important newspaper in America, make such an extreme credibility destroying move right after having lost so much of their remaining credibility after getting caught cheating for Hillary? Such an extreme move smacks of desperation.

From what could they be so desperate to distract us? Could it be Pizzagate, which by itself could set the globalist elite back 50 years?

Thursday, November 24, 2016

They Live

How do we know they exist?

You know … the globalists, also known as: the New World Order, the shadow government, the deep state, etc.

How do we know there is one cabal with the ability to perpetrate and cover up conspiracies such as 9/11 ?

Certainly they couldn’t be omnipotent or else they would wouldn’t have to hide in the shadows …

Are the building blocks there? Well … we know that people having no conscience exist, and we know that people who value power above all else exist. We know that hate, greed, intelligence, hierarchy, and secrecy exist. Threats, bribes, blackmail and extortion exist. Deceit, bias, and superstition exist. Spies, surveillance, informants, infiltrators, and agent provocateurs exist. Propaganda, false flags, and cover ups exist. Patience and delayed gratification exist. Secret societies and conspiracies exist … so … all of the basic building blocks are there, but what about more concrete mechanisms that we know exist?

Intelligence agencies and national security exist. Torture, redaction, and secret courts (FISA) exist. The power of the President to assassinate or indefinitely detain a citizen (NDAA) exists. The ability to secretly create trillions of dollars out of thin air (Federal Reserve, money as electronic bits, and fractional reserve banking) exists. Constitutional violations exist. Propaganda budgets exist. People above the law exist, like Hillary Clinton, and we just saw how the entire media and crony corporations (the Internet gatekeepers) conspired to elect Hillary.

It is not necessary that their plans always succeed in order for their agenda to advance. It is only necessary that not too many people see the conspiracy. For example, if they needed a terrorist incident to manipulate the public into supporting more of a police state (e.g. The Patriot Act), then they could fail repeatedly until they succeeded – as long as not too many people knew the truth about any of those efforts. (The truth denies what deception provides.)

It is not necessary that they successfully hide all of a conspiracy in order for their agenda to advance. It is only necessary that not too many see how high the conspiracy really goes. For example, in the case of the 2016 election, too many people now know that much of the media and crony corporations (the Internet gatekeepers) conspired to elect Hillary, but what if Trump were also working for them? In that case, their agenda would still move forward.

Nevertheless, for a single cabal to exist at the top for decades or even centuries, we know it would need another level of motivation, power, and tools beyond what we have discussed thus far in order to carry out a plan and keep it secret. For example, there might be as much as one hundred layers of hierarchy from the top down to the cop on the street, and thus they certainly couldn’t pass orders down through a chain of command that deep because that would leave too much evidence and there would be too many whistleblowers to keep it secret.

One of the simplest but most effective tools used by the cabal to maintain secrecy is compartmentalization, which is where an agent performing a task is only given the minimum information and motivation needed to carry out a specifc task. It is not necessary that each player in a conspiracy know the whole plan or even that he is part of a conspiracy. Such an agent doesn’t know the motives or identities of those at the top, and doesn’t even have any way to verify where the top originates.

An agent could be working for a foreign entity … or even extraterrestrials … he doesn’t really know. He only knows that he trusts the guy directly above him, beside him, and under him. All the rest is a narrative he has been sold. If he has a conscience, then the narrative convinces him he is working for the good guys. If he has no conscience, then he doesn’t need a narrative, he is just doing it for the reward and because he likes doing the task itself. (Both types have value. One is willing to do things prohibited by a normal conscience, and the other is more motivated and may even be willing to die for his cause.)

Now consider that, just like in any secret society, a different narrative can be given to members at each level. For example, one can easily imagine a narrative that would persuade certain members of the CIA to perpetrate 9/11. After all, only 3000 people died, the important people were warned ahead of time, the buildings were going to be demolished anyway, and without 9/11, we couldn’t have enacted laws like the Patriot Act, which we needed to protect us from terrorists who might use a nuke and kill three million instead of three thousand. An agent who perpetrated 9/11 thus helped to save millions of lives. He is a hero … at least ... that is the narrative he has bought, and of course, if he has no conscience then he doesn’t need a narrative. Those below this level might not be told that the most important people were warned ahead of time; whereas, those above this level might be told that the Patriot Act is a necessary step to achieivng global government.

Now suppose an agent started to doubt that he is working for the good guys. He would not go from true believer to whistleblower all at once. He would give off signs that warn his handlers, and thus before he betrayed them, they would neutralize him. Consider that pretty much the entire business of the CIA can be described as ways to detect who needs to be neutralized, and then to neutralize them – and keep it secret.

To be continued …

Friday, November 18, 2016

The Globalists Chose Trump

Those at the top (a.k.a. the globalists, the new world order, the shadow government, and the deep state) are not omnipotent. They are just psychopaths hiding in the shadows. They are just players who have been slowly and secretly consolidating power for decades, and perhaps for centuries. (Deception provides what the truth denies.) Their plays only work because we are asleep, but as each of us awakens and becomes immune to their plays, they lose power.

America is the goose that laid the golden egg. It is their power base, and so, inside America, they had preferred the more peaceful route to global domination, which was Hillary, but we wouldn’t just give it to them. Using the truth, we made Hillary too much of a liability and thereby forced them to go with Trump, who was their plan B. (The truth denies what deception provides.) From their perspective, we will get what we deserve because those who make peaceful enslavement impossible, make violent enslavement inevitable.

They are currently desperate, and thus at maximum danger.

On March 2nd, 2016, the most likely plan by the globalists (to those lacking inside information) was: Trump is a Ringer. Hillary is Trump's Bitch. It was within Trump's power from the beginning to guarantee a Clinton Victory – like Ross Perot did for Bill Clinton. In exchange, one must assume that Trump would have owned Hillary. Of course, there was nothing Trump could do to guarantee his own victory given how the globalists control government, the media, voting machines, and the Internet gatekeepers. Such cheating could deliver about 25% of the total votes to a candidate – like it did for Obama. Therefore, those who said they knew Trump would win because of his true appeal to voters or because of his persuasive skills were not accounting  for how the world really works.

In other words, an anti-establishment candidate would have to be worthy of a 25% margin of victory in a fair system just to get 50% of the vote in our rigged system. Given a fair system, in Trump’s case, he would have only won with a 10% spread instead of 25%. Just for comparison, Ronald Reagan would have won with a 30% spread. It may seem like Trump would have won with a bigger spread given a fair system, but the unfairness of the system and the bias and violence of Hillary voters was a large part of Trump’s appeal. Of course, given a fair system, Trump and Hillary would never have been candidates in the first place.

Trump barely won the electoral vote and lost the popular vote. He would have lost if any one of the things in his favor had not happened. Trump would have lost without Hillary’s health problems, Project Veritas, Wikileaks, Dinesh D'Souza, Weinergate, or without any one of many other factors that no one predicted. Even what little damage was done to Hillary by James Comey was enough to give Trump his slim margin of victory. Trump would have lost if several hard core delusional leftists in the media had not inexplicably begun helping him the week before the election. Trump would have lost if the media and the government had decided to make the allegations against him stick – at least through the election. He would have lost if anyone released another candid audio clip, of which several must certainly have been available.

Given Hillary’s bad health, and given how the globalists let Brexit happen, and given the highly improbable help one or two weeks before the election, it appeared plausible, though not likely, that the globalists had decided near election time that they wanted Trump to win; and with Trump's victory, and with his immediate backpedaling, we now know that is what happened – but why?

I think the globalists had decided that if Hillary had won, then government, academia, the media, and crony corporations would have lost too much credibility and would rightly have been seen as the enemy by too many people. If that had happened, then the globalists would have faced far more resistance going forward. They would even have been at risk of losing everything; whereas, now, they can claim that the system worked and that it was fair. For their agenda to succeed, the people must believe they are free and in control. Harriet Tubman said, "I freed a thousand slaves, and I could have freed a thousand more, if only they had known they were slaves."

Another benefit from Hillary’s loss is the ease with which globalists can provoke violence from the losers, and consider that all conflict can be used by the globalists as a pretext for more of a police state. Of course, they could have provoked as much conflict if Trump had lost, but now they can get two-for-one if they have the electoral college elect Hillary. This seems unlikely, but it is the kind of thing they can do when they are ready to incite insurrection.

It is more likely that they will not risk their credibility by using the electoral college to elect Hillary because they can simply wait 4 years and get the electoral collage repealed by a Constitutional amendment proposed by the next globalist President and his globalist Congress. It would be expensve to get ratification by 38 of the 50 states, but it would be worth it to them, and they could certainly fudge a few states.

Perhaps the main benefit of a Hillary loss for the globalists is how they can claim that bad voters elected bad people, and then, at any time, the globalists can trigger the collapse they have had primed for years, and their media will blame it on nationalists, conservatives, capitalists, racists, patriots, and anti-establishment types. For the problems caused by the globalists, their front men will propose solutions that will indirectly and eventually advance their agenda, which is: one world currency, one world government, one world religion, total dependence on government, total control by government, and total powerlessness of individuals.

Trump will feign reluctance when he gives in to globalist solutions for the crash they themselves caused. Consider that Trump not only was a Demoocrat, but that in 2013 he proposed the globalist solution to the crash of 2008 when he said, "We will have to leave borders behind and go for global unity when it comes to financial stability."

These are volatile times, and thus there are other possibilities, but a last minute switch to Trump by the globalists seems the most probable. It is almost as likley that they wanted Trump all along and were playing both us and most of their own front men and all of their useful idiots the whole time in order to give Trump street cred as the anti-globalist candidate. There is perhpaa 1% chance that Trump is backpedaling to deceive the globalists so they don’t do anything extreme to stop him before the electoral college votes and before he takes office. There is even a 1% chance that if we block too many of their moves by outing them ahead of time, then they will trump us by inciting insurrection and blaming it on us, which in the short term could be done through an electoral college surprise or a recount surprise.

Where I think they have miscalculated is that I don’t think they will be able to blame their opponents to the extent they need. In fact, we can derail their plans for years if we wake up enough people so that their attempted misdirection becomes too risky for them. Consider that we derailed their plans for Hillary by making her too much of a liability for them. We thereby forced them to go with their plan B.

The crash will have to come in January 2018 at the earliest to ensure that it is blamed on anti-establishment types and not on Obama. It is possible (30%) that this could be the big one … where the globalists perpetrate a 3 – 12 month collpase, declare martial law, trade bread for guns at FEMA camps, implant RFID chips, force vaccinations, bring in foreign troops, ban cash, collapse the US dollar, and execute a “night of the long knives” to take out likely resistance leaders. Such an extreme move would be pretty risky for them, so I think a lesser crisis is more likely, and if we wake up enough people before then, I suspect their plan B will be a crash more like 2008 with a modest move towards global currency.

A useful word to begin using is collaborator. Top progressives and neocons (Republican progressives) are collaborators.

Consider how Germans began to talk about loyalty in the 1920’s and 30’s. I don’t think this is coincidence. I think the US is being herded into the position of Germany in WWI and WWII.

The globalists see the armed American people as the last thing standing between them and global domination. This includes that minority of the US military still more loyal to the US people than to the government. Therefore, they must take down the American people as soon as they think they can succeed without looking like the bad guys.

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Yesman (Comey's Song)

I can't stand to lie
I'm not that naïve
I'm just out to find
The better part of me

I'm more than a turd
I'm more than a bane
More than some big disgrace behind the reign

It's not easy to be me

Wish that I could cry
Fall upon my knees
Find a way to lie
About the balls I'll never see

It may sound absurd
But don't be naïve
Even zeroes have the right to breed

I may be disturbed
But won't you concede
Even zeroes have the right to dream

It's not easy to be me

Grow up and just stay
Away from me
It's not all right

You cannot sleep sound tonight
It's too crazy
for anything

I can't stand to lie
I'm not that naïve
Men weren't meant to thrive
Without balls between their knees.

I'm only a man hiding out in DC
Digging for something right on this one way street
Only a man hiding out on E Street
Looking for special things inside of me

It's not easy to be me.

Sunday, October 23, 2016

The Don’t Vote Psyop

Many who refuse to vote have been played by the Don’t Vote Psyop.

Consider that I vote even though I don't need any rulers, which makes me a kind of anarchist – an anarchist who votes – but only for candidates who might effect a net gain in freedom, reality, and quality of life.

I know that democracy is illegitimate.

I know that the Constitution either authorizes the government we have, or has been unable to prevent it.

I know that one vote cannot make a difference.

I know all of this, and still I vote.

I know that the system is rigged so that it has become nearly impossible for good candidates to win or to effect change if they do win.

I know that government schools, mainstream churches, crony corporations, the entire mainstream media, most of the "alternative" media, millions of individuals who depend on government, and millions of other useful idiots ...
will fabricate …
will prevent debate ...
to prevent good candidates from winning ...
to prevent them from effecting change if they do win ...
and to prevent them from existing in the first place ...
just as there were no capitalist candidates in the USSR.

I know that most good people, at any point, can be turned with bribes and threats.

I know that any good person who is about to effect change, and who cannot be turned, will be killed.

I know all of this, and still I vote.

I know that the perpetrators (the enemies of humanity) and their useful idiots will spout the logical fallacy that if I vote, then I support the system, but of course, it is possible to vote and not support the system – I do it all the time.

Those at the top are just trying to bully me into not voting. Naturally, if you are awake, then they don't want you to vote, which is why they spread the logically fallacious meme that voting is acceptance of the system. I call this the Don't Vote Psyop.

I know that the Don't Vote Psyop makes my vote even less effective, but still I vote.

Most of the people don't know any of the things I know, but they do know that "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable." When violent revolution comes, the media will spin it as how so-called rebels chose to fight rather than vote, and they will thus succeed in making those who refused to vote be unfairly viewed as the scourge of humanity. Then, it will be even more difficult to educate others – to put it mildly.

There are other reasons to vote.

Consider that one can write in any name for President. Now consider that if there are no other candidates in any other races who might be a net gain, then not voting for them would make it clear that someone who voted rejected all of those other candidates. That is worth saying. Also, imagine that universally accepted good guy James Corbett (among those who refuse to vote) received one write-in vote. Now imagine that he received one million write-in votes. That would send a message that is worth the effort of saying it.

Sometimes, the correct decision is actually voting for the lesser of two evils, but only if they were even in an accurate poll, and only if there were no third candidate who had any chance of winning. For example, suppose you had access to the results of an accurate poll of every voter in your state, and suppose that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton got the exact same number of votes in that poll. Now suppose you believed that Donald Trump was clearly the lesser of two evils, and was thus clearly a net gain over Hillary, but you used your weapon (your vote) to vote third party, or suppose you didn’t use you weapon at all, and then Hillary won your state by one vote … and suppose winning your state caused Hillary to win the Presidency …  That would make you a pretty douchy person. You would know it, and everyone you know would know it. You would never live it down.

To be clear, voting is the least effective thing I do. It is far more valuable to educate myself and others, but that is also far more time consuming and expensive. I wouldn't vote if it cost me any more time, money, or other trouble, and I wouldn't vote if there were no candidates who might effect a net gain. Nor would I fight for the right to vote in such a corrupt. anti-human. illegitimate system because voting is so ineffective, and especially because voting is how the rulers make the people believe that they are free and that their rulers are legitimate. Harriet Tubman said, "I freed a thousand slaves, and I could have freed a thousand more ... if only they had known they were slaves."

Finally, your act of voting will generate good will from others; whereas, not voting is a slap in the face to others. Voting signals to others that you are responsible and peaceful, and it is even an opportunity to educate those at the ballot box who will be more engaged than at any other time.

Anyone who falls for the Don’t Vote Psyop has been played.

Saturday, October 15, 2016

The Trump Speech that Would Get My Vote

Napoleon said …
Every soldier carries a Field Marshal’s baton in his pack.
The opportunity was there.
Anyone could rise from the bottom to the top.

That used to be America.
But America is a corrupt cronyist system.
That’s why America is circling the drain.

Who can rise to the top of a cronyist system?
Only cronies ...
Government, corporations, the media …
The top are corrupt cronies.
I know this because I was at the top.
Now I’ve been kicked out of the club.

They’re all on the same side.
Democrats, Republicans …
Bushes, Clintons, Obamas …
They work for the same people.
And they will do anything to maintain their power.

What do they want?
More power.
What do they want for you?
They want you powerless and dependent.
Look at what they have done to the black community.

Harriet Tubman said …
I freed a thousand slaves,
and I could have free a thousand more …
If only they had known they were slaves.

I could stop here …
but their propaganda machine won’t let me.
If we’re going to make America great again,
we have to fight back.

We know they’re liars.
They know they’re liars.
They can manufacture many new accusers each day …
if that’s what they think they need.

Which gets us back to how slaves didn’t know they were slaves.
Today … we have elections.
That’s how the people know they’re free. <smirk>

But how can an election be fair …
If the media are all on one side?
If they are playing, good cop – bad cop?
If the media fabricate and censor?
If the corporations fabricate and censor?

Whether you believe we were created …
or the product of evolution …
The leftist, feminist, politically correct agenda …
Goes against our genes.

Such denial …
That’s why violence and racism are worse.
That’s why no one is happy.
That’s why America is cirling the drain.

Women want to get married and have kids.
Men want to get married and have kids.
So, why do the media ridicule what 96% want?
Why do they ridicule what works?
Why do they promote every other arrangement?

But there is also tension.
Men want to impregnate as many women as possible,
And women want to be impregnated with the best genes,
Which are those men who can impregnate the most women.

It should come as no surprise then, what happens …
In the world of politicians, Hollywood, and the rich.
Addiction is rampant …
Because opportunity is rampant.

If you find women irresistable, you can have women.
That may not be a fashionable arrangement anymore,
But that is the least of their crimes …
In a culture addicted to drugs …
In a culture that flies to Pedophile Island …

Lookup the Franklin Scandal.
Many at the top, around the world, are pedophiles.
They think you just don’t understand.

Hillary knows.
She defended a man she believed had raped a 12 year old girl.
She called the girl a liar.
She laughed about the whole thing.
You can listen to the audio yourself.

But that’s not how she knows so much about it.
She’s married to Bill Clinton.
She not only said his rape victims were liars …
She destroyed them.

Like Bill Clinton …
Like Socrates …
I find women irresistable.
It’s how they look. It’s how they act.
Women were irresistable to me …
when I was younger.

On TV how you look …
How you act …
It’s part of the job description.
It is the job description.

I’m a tall, famous, rich, and powerful alpha male.
That’s the genes women are looking for.
I am irresistable to many women …
especially in that world.

My locker room talk was not fabrication,
but it was exaggeration.
and unlike Bill Clinton …
If women didn’t reciprocate …
I let them be.

You can vote for the kown perpetrator and/or promoter of rape …
Negligence, deceit  …
Corruption, cronyism …
Racism, poverty …
Murder, conspiracy …
Dictators, pedophiles …
Terrorism, treason …
War, and genocide …

The perpetrator … to be
Of a draft …
and of a civil war inducing gun decision from her Supreme Court

Or …
You can vote for the Kissing Bandito.

If you want to see the future of the denial that runs America,
Just look at Sweden.
This country of 10 million has one million Muslim immigrants –
Mostly young men – not real refugees.
Sweden also has a 1500% increase in rape,
But if you say it’s the Muslims,
Or if you say they’re not real refugees,
You will go to jail.

America has a choice.
If Americans continue to live in denial …
America will continue to circle the drain.

If Americans are ready to think for themselves,
If Americans are ready to grow up,
then together,
we can make America great again.

----------

I, a libertarian, voluntaryist, anarchist, anarcho capitalist, agorist, etc. would vote for Trump if he gave this speech because he might be a significant net gain for freedom, reality, and quality of life; whereas, Hillary, Jill Stein, and Gary Johnson would all be a definite net loss.

Ordinarily I would have voted for the Libertarian Party candidate, Gary Johnson, but he has so clearly sold out that he would simply be a net loss for freedom, reality, and quality of life – one way or another. That’s the whole point of selling out.

Also, the other candidates all seem to be terrified of what people might say about them, which makes it nearly impossible for them to fight effectively; whereas, Trump …

Nevertheless … I would not give money or time to Trump because he only – might – be a net gain. I would only give money or time to a candidate who was a highly probable net gain. For example, I gave money to Gary Johnson in 2012.

Also, I’m not persuaded by the “Don’t Vote“ Psyop. If you are awake, they don’t want you to vote. So, if you don’t vote, then you have been played.

Monday, October 10, 2016

Never Hillary

This is a message to those thinking about voting for Hillary.

Under a President Hillary Clinton, two specific inevitabilities will hit everyone hard:

1) Young men will be drafted for a war. Do you know any young men or boys? How will you explain your vote for Hillary to them?

2) Any Hillary appointee who fills the Supreme Court seat left empty by the very suspicious death of Scalia will be the fifth vote to disarm the people, and will thus flip the former 5-4 majority against civil war to a 5-4 majority for civil war. Anywhere from 10,000 to 10,000,000 will die. Then how will you explain your vote for Hillary?

It may not be personal to most Americans, but hundreds of thousands of innocent people will die in other countries – as happened under Bush and as happened under Obama.

These are not certainties under other candidates.

Some general Hillary induced malaise will be:

  • You will be lied to – a lot.
  • The economy will continue to languish – just like under Obama and Bush – ever since the crash at the end of the Bill Clinton administration.
  • You will have to hear about scandal after scandal where the Clintons turn out to be above the law.
  • You will almost certainly witness an expansion of the policies of Obama, which were themselves an expansion of the policies of Bush.
  • Did I mention you will be lied to … a lot?

How will you live with yourself if you voted for Hillary?

Saturday, October 8, 2016

Rule of Market vs. The World

Grandpa, after Rule of Market replaced Rule of Law, why didn't some foreign power just take over? It seems like they could have just threated to nuke a city unless it accepted their rule, and when that first city chose to fight instead of surrendering, then the next city would see how they got nuked and would comply immediately.

You see Timmy, that used to work. In fact, that's how Genghis Khan took over several cities, and that's why several foreign powers did indeed try something like that.

Now, they all knew that the people were well armed and would resist, so they took a few years to prepare. The first foreign threat that emerged tried a direct assault in Maine and New Hampshire ... kind of like Red Dawn I guess ... They launched several EMPs and waited for folks to get out their equipment that had been shielded from EMP attack, and then they attacked with EMPs again. They also cut the power grid, which was easy to do because, although it was now shielded from EMP, it was still a centralized system that was about a year away from becoming decentralized like the Internet. Most folks figure that is why they attacked when they did instead of taking longer to prepare. They really thought that taking out the power grid would be a knockout punch, but they couldn't have been more wrong.

Tens of thousands of individuals in that area had been preparing for such an event. Some had accurately foreseen the threat, but for most, that was just how they liked to spend their spare time and money. For example, they each had independent power generation, stealth technology, drones, and armor piercing bullets. Some even had directed energy weapons, ELF technology, and insect drones. The invaders simply did not understand the explosion of wealth and freedom under Rule Of Market.

The invaders were attacked in thousands of unique ways that they hadn't anticipated because each patriot had his own ideas, so the centralized invasion force simply couldn't adapt. Perhaps the most resourceful individual was a man known to history only as "Future Bob". The invaders had been so on edge after several weeks of relentless surprises and setbacks that he was able to drive out an entire battalion with his creative use of ELF technology to beam speech directly into their heads in their native language while simultaneously attacking them with thousands of insect drones. Most of them killed each other in the chaos and fear that ensued.

This first invasion was over in about 6 weeks. They didn't even fight long enough to find out about the payback on its way to their home land. Nor had they yet figured out how their defeat had greatly strengthened the underground resistance in their own capitol.

Before the full consequences of the first attack had unfolded, a second foreign power figured this first attack had created a unique opportunity. It thought it had learned from the mistakes of the first aggressor and that it would attack before the resistance had time to regroup, but like those first aggressors, they couldn't have been more wrong.

Perhaps their biggest mistake was their assumption that under Rule of Market, those outside the battle zone had no obligation or incentive to intervene. They didn't know that after six weeks, the first wave of about a million mobilized individuals had each independently traveled to the battle zone and had already been providing firepower, logistics, supplies, morale, intelligence, counterintelligence ... and ... it was a beautiful thing ... They came from as far away as Alaska.

What about Hawaii? That state would have had more incentive to help out than anyone so that others would reciprocate later.

No, at that time Hawaii was too afraid of living under the Rule of Market, and so, under the leadership of governor Obama, they had petitioned to become part of China, but boy did they ever regret that decision ... poor Obama ... but that's another story ...

Both aggressors wanted to milk the region – like a colony – and did not want to destroy it, but after seeing how the patriots had taken out most of the leadership in the first invader's home land by working with the underground resistance there, the second invaders escalated and used their heaviest conventional weapons. They even used nerve gas in some areas, which had little effect on the dispersed resistance. Needless to say, the payback included gas attacks in addition to snipers and more creative tactics. The second invasion also lasted about six weeks.

This second victory by the patriots gave pause to additional foreign powers, and during that pause, domestic resistance in those foreign lands grew exponentially. The Rule of Market was becoming an existential threat to governments everywhere.

It was about 18 months later when the most advanced foreign power threatened to nuke a city unless it came under their rule, but the city refused and prepared to retaliate ... well ... actually, this particular city had over one million subscribers to more than 30 protection agencies, and it was they who prepared to retaliate.

The foreign power was mostly bluffing because they didn't want to kill the goose that laid the golden egg, but they knew they could not back down, so they detonated a tactical nuke that destroyed about 4 blocks in a low value part of the city. It just so happened that those blocks were adjacent to the neighborhood of Leroy and his guardians.

Some protection agencies had no ability to project force into the foreign nation, so they compensated by covering all of the domestic obligations of the more advanced agencies. Also, there were several billionaires in the city who had their own methods of dealing with threats. Then there were the other agencies and individuals who wanted to help so that no foreign government could gain a foothold in the land.

The foreign capitol had to fend off no less than 23 independent efforts, but they were expecting most of them. They defended against a hypersonic ballistic missile, several supersonic cruise missiles, and several cyber attacks. They knew that no one was willing to perform a suicide HALO mission in retaliation, after all, they had only attacked the poorest and least populated blocks in the city, but what they didn't count on was the huge publicity opportunity. Two billionaires pooled their efforts to send in Leroy's guardians, who were known as heroes throughout the land. One would provide the weapon, and the other would provide the cyber attack that would cover their insertion and extraction.

Leroy's guardians were little more than a neighborhood watch ... of former navy seals, airborne rangers, and marines. They had to set up three small generators in an equilateral triangle whose center was the emperor's palace. The HALO insertion was flawless and undetected. One hour later, the emperor's palace, and the emperor, were vaporized as he was addressing a crowd of hundreds of thousands while hundreds of millions watched on TV.

The emperor's intelligence agencies never dreamed that three poor unskilled black men could have done it. Nor could they have believed that the perpetrators of such an operation would have left for home in a little fishing boat – with local help!

As predicted, the publicity was worth billions. It was a profitable operation.

Curiously though, the United Nations and most foreign leaders began claiming the patriots were the aggressors, and that such power in the hands of individuals was a global threat. That was the catalyst that caused the majority of patriots to break out of their normalcy bias and realize that foreign governments were indirectly controlled by the globalists, who for generations had been committed to one world government, one world currency, one world religion, no armed citizens, total control of individuals, and total dependence on government.

The window of opportunity was closing for the globalist end game. Some say the globalists had captured a real alien and were able to make limited use of the technology in his scout ship and used real footage of him – all against his will.

The Pope and other Jesuits, along with thousands of other globalist shills, had been preparing the world for an alien visitation for years. The world believed that the alien and his people were giving the earth the knowledge of a more advanced – a more global – government, currency, and spirituality – where there was no potential for some crazy citizen to harm others. They promised additional gifts of technology once we had “progressed” to the point where no crazy citizen would have the freedom to use that technology to hurt anyone.

But grandpa! The alien agenda was the globalist agenda!

Yes, that was pretty obvious to the patriots too because we had a free press, but the rest of the world only had propaganda, except for the growing underground resistance, who got unfiltered Internet.

It was about three years after the palace had been vaporized when the putative "aliens" said that the Rule of Market was a reactionary resurgence of the failed flawed fatal policies of the past, and that because their technology could fall into the hands of patriots who were unregulated in their uses of it, that they could never trust the earth with the kinds of advanced alien technologies that would end hunger, sickness, climate change, and provide free energy for all.

Naturally, this propaganda made about half of the people of the world want to kill the patriots.

The "aliens" gave the patriots an ultimatum, and of course, the patriots said the aliens were not real and farted in their general direction.

Grandpa!

As punishment, the "aliens" used a beam from space that could vaporize a city block. They destroyed several blocks in each of the most "dangerous" cities. Of course, there was no crime in those cities, but they were the hotbeds of technical innovation, and they had individual citizens who owned nukes and other super weapons.

But grandpa, humans had such satellite weapons by then.

Ah, but the world didn't know about such secret weapons programs yet. The patriots had just gotten word to the underground at the same time the globalists had begun their attack, so word had not spread far enough yet to make the world suspicious.

The "aliens" were so nice that they would warn the patriots 4 hours before each attack. That was expected to result in much chaos and death, and thus greatly embarrass the patriots and cause them to kill more of each other than the attack itself, but the aliens didn't seem to know that everyone had bugout plans, which had become a cultural fetish. Half had already bugged out anyway, and the rest were gone within the 4 hours.

The "aliens" kept assuming that such a flawless bugout was a fluke each time.

Needless to say, the patriots would not surrender and thus the globalists had to escalate.

Next, the globalists introduced a hostile "alien" race, who said the humans were too dangerous and also just too stupid and ungrateful, and must be wiped out. They also began to use pretty much the same kind of beam from space to attacked cities in multiple countries, but the "good aliens" said that we were worth saving and defeated the bad aliens in a spectacular light show in the sky. Then the good aliens said that we humans needed to deal with those cowboy Rule of Market patriots before another hostile alien race came along.

Puleeease!

Grandpa, who would believe that was aliens instead of the globalists?

Everyone believed it, and they wanted to kill the patriots more than ever. Everyone was being played by the globalists, who had manipulated billions into demanding the alien agenda, which was actually the globalist agenda, and demanding the death of any who opposed that agenda. Before that, even most patriots didn’t understand that players don’t have to give orders to make billions carry out their agenda.

So, how did you all survive?

Years of independent efforts had converged to destroy the satellite weapon, but that wasn’t what really ended the globalists. Not even close. No one even knew we had destroyed it, and they were only days away from sending up another one, and they had nukes, nerve gas, conventional weapons, and billions ready to march.

So, how did you do it?!

Well, most of the world leaders were just front men for the globalists at the top. So, some of the more savvy patriots had been identifying the top globalists since as far back as 1970, and they had formed what are known as zero squads.

A zero squad is a cell of three individuals known only to each other who have selected a top globalist whom they will sacrifice their lives to take out if necessary – if such globalists ever tried to perpetrate their end game.

So, what happened?!

They were supplemented by many new zero squads of both patriot and underground resistance forces, which ensured that every top globalist was covered two or three times over. Still, a few got away, but their front men knew that if their masters were not safe, then they weren't either, so they told us the "good aliens" had just left and said they would be back in 100 years to check our progress.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

No One Beats Al Qaeda

The US has tried for years to beat Al Qaeda, but now, after Americans have given up much freedom to central government and borrowed trillions of dollars from central banks, there is more terrorism than ever before. Nevertheless, don’t blame the FBI or the CIA, or Bush or Obama. There is no shame in being beaten by the best.

Al Qaeda must be at least a generation ahead of the US – both strategically and technologically.

In fact, the only weakness of Al Qaeda is that they keep leaving their passports at the crime scene, but consider that their passports are indestructable. America simply doesn’t have the technology yet to make indestructable passports, so clearly, those Al Qaeda scientists in those caves in Afghanistan are at least a generation ahead of the US. Al Qaeda passports are so tough that they were found on the street after the towers collapsed – unscathed. Maybe this doesn’t sound as scary as it should … until one considers that none of the four black boxes were recovered from the towers.  So, America’s most indestructable technology (black boxes) were vaporized under conditions where Al Qaeda passports survived – unscathed. It’s not as if American black boxes are crap either (they have never been completely destroyed before); it’s that Al Qaeda technology is just that good.

What other possible explanation could there be? It’s almost as if …

See what I mean about strategic brilliance? Al Qaeda almost tricked me into considering whether 9/11 could be an inside job, and whether those Al Qaeda scientists in those Afghan caves are not really a generation ahead of the US, but an inside job is clearly impossibe because the CIA is not allowed to operate inside the US.

The evidence for Al Qaeda superiority is overwhelming. Consider that Al Qaeda knocked down three towers with only two planes! No one else could have done that. Two planes hit two towers, and then a third tower (WTC7) collapsed a few hours later. The NIST explained a few years later that it was an ordinary office fire that resulted in what everyone says looks exactly like a controlled demolition, but how is it that only Al Qaeda knew that WTC 7 was the only building in the world that would collapse exactly like a controlled demolition as a result of an ordinary office fire? What’s more, they somehow tricked the owner, Larry Silverstein, and John Kerry too, into claiming years earlier that we brought WTC 7 down as a controlled demolition because it was badly damaged, but how did they trick America’s best into confessing to a conspiracy that never happened? Clearly, they even have some kind of mind control.

I could go on for pages and pages, but there is one hope – Israel. Israel may lag behind Al Qaeda scientists in those Afghan caves, but their strategic brilliance may be as advaned as that of Al Qaeda, so America’s best bet is to give Israel all of our technology, and to borrow trillions more dollars and give them to Israel.

Unfortunately, Al Qaeda has already thought of this, and may have successfully neutralized Israel when it tricked several Mossad agents into setting up cameras ahead of time on 9/11 and dancing with joy when the towers collapsed. Even if Al Qaeda’s preemptive move has made it politically impossible to give everything to Israel, at least Israel is our strongest ally in the region and is thus far more important than before 9/11 …

Monday, September 5, 2016

Obama Still A Half-Black Gay Socialist

There has been increasing talk of how the Nobel committee should revoke Obama’s 2009 peace prize. After all, he has done eveything Bush did and more. Critics feel that surely the Nobel committee must now see their mistake, but consider that none of their reasons have changed, and thus they see no mistake. Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize for the same reason he was given everything else in his life – because he was a half-black gay socialist – not all black – that would be too black, and of course, Obama is still a half-black gay socialist, so they see no mistake.

Although everyone acknowledged that Obama had not actually done anything yet to earn the Nobel Peace Prize, the Nobel committee was given the necessary cover they needed for such an implausible move because the media had already given the world “The Myth of Obama”. Or more accurately, the media had already given Obama the Myth of Obama – for the same reason Obama has been given everything else.

Although Obama appears to be no smarter than Bush. He does have some additional attributes that help to explain why everything has been given to him. In a nutshell, he is an excellent front man.

For example, Obama is tall and has a good voice. Also, Obama is photogenic – not as photogenic as people think – but photogenic enough, with the help of make up and Photoshop applied by the media. That’s just part of the Myth of Obama – the media’s gift to Obama.

Obama is also a good enough actor. He just has to be a blank canvas onto which the media paint the Myth of Obama. For example, he just has to read the teleprompter and never step out of character and never say what he really thinks about white people, America, or anything else; which brings us to his final qualities that explain why everything has been given to him – he is anti-white and anti-American.

Therefore, since 2009 nothing has changed. In fact, just a few days ago Obama’s CDC expanded his police state further. Nevertheless, the war protesters and human rights activists on the left, who disappeared as soon as Obama took office, haven’t come back because their reasons for disappearing have not changed – Obama is still a half-black gay socialist.

Socialists (and other progressives) have all the information they need to know that Obama has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people, that he has ruined the lives of millions, and that he has worsened the lives of billions … but they don’t care so much about that … what they really care about is whether Obama is an anti-white anti-American half-black gay socialist.

Friday, September 2, 2016

CDC Expands Police State With Indefinite Detainment

On 8/15/16, Obama’s CDC claimed the authority to expand the police state with a new regulation that grants it the right to indefinitely detain any individual or group (even a city) based on subjective, aritrary, and ambiguous reasons and with no plausible way of preventing the usual bias and corruption. Of course, such an atrocity would be unethical and unconstitutional even if it were objective, well defined, and impartial.

As of this writing, the regulation is not in force yet and is in the form of a proposed regulation. One can read the whole proposed regulation at: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/08/15/2016-18103/control-of-communicable-diseases#h-21

image

The following excerpt is the section on “Apprehension”, which  speaks for itself:

Aprehension

Under section 361(d)(1) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 264(d)(1)), HHS/CDC may promulgate regulations that provide for the apprehension and examination of any individual reasonably believed to be infected with a quarantinable communicable disease in a qualifying stage. In addition, HHS/CDC must reasonably believe that the individual is moving or about to move between states or constitutes a probable source of infection to others who may be moving between states. Thus, HHS/CDC believes that it is important to define for the public what is meant by the term “apprehension.” Apprehension means the temporary taking into custody of an individual or group for purposes of determining whether quarantine, isolation, or conditional release is warranted.

Although each instance is unique, an apprehension will typically occur at the request of a state or local health department or in other time-sensitive situations, such as at a U.S. port of entry, where it is necessary for HHS/CDC to take immediate action to protect public health. The factors that may give rise to an apprehension are discussed in detail in the preamble section discussing the definition of “reasonably believed to be infected, as applied to an individual.” When an apprehension occurs, the individual is not free to leave or discontinue his/her discussion with an HHS/CDC public health or quarantine officer. In some cases, an apprehension may last from twenty minutes to one to two hours if, for instance, based on a public health assessment, HHS/CDC is able to quickly rule out the presence of a quarantinable communicable disease. In certain circumstances, the individual may remain apprehended pending confirmation that he or she is not infected or not reasonably believed to be infected with a quarantinable communicable disease. If it is necessary to issue the individual a Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release, the individual will remain apprehended pending the service of the written order. The factors that may give rise to an order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release are discussed in detail in the preamble section discussing the definition of “reasonably believed to be infected, as applied to an individual.” Based on past experience, HHS/CDC believes that a written Federal order may be served to an individual within 24-48 hours of an apprehension. These timeframes are merely offered as guidance and HHS/CDC believes that the facts and circumstances of each case will dictate the expected length of an apprehension. Generally, however, HHS/CDC does not expect that the typical public health apprehension will last longer than 72 hours. It is not HHS/CDC's intent through this definition to allow for extended apprehensions absent the issuance of a Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release. HHS/CDC requests public comment concerning the expected apprehension period (no longer than 72 hours), and whether there are any public concerns with the absence of a specific maximum apprehension period in the regulation.

This atrocity by the CDC can be used to educate the people on why the Second Amendment exists.

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

The Coming Alien Hoax

Don’t believe anything the media, the government, the Vatican, or even any supposedly alternative source, like Alex Jones, tells you about aliens if their story could in any way further the agenda of the most powerful people in the world. Instead, think for yourself about what real aliens would do, what they would be able to do, and what they would believe. Also, think about what kind of extraordinary evidence would be necessary to prove the extraordinary claim that an actual alien invasion is a more likely explanation than a human conspiracy.

The agenda of the most powerful people in the world is: one world government, one world currency, one world religion, no armed citizens, total dependence on government, and total control over individuals. Let’s refer to these totalitarians as ”the globalists”. Some specific uses for such power by the globalists would be to reduce population in order to sanitize the human gene pool and to preserve what they see as their resources.

Almost any kind of alien hoax would further the globalist agenda. An alien invasion would be the most effective hoax because a majority would be willing to make unlimited sacrifices for survival, and they would comply with even the most extreme national security measures. They would also demand global government.

The second most useful alien hoax would be a putatively peaceful visit that bestowed the gifts of more advanced government and more advanced spiritually. Of coure, those gifts would be global government, global currency, and global religion, and no potential for some crazy citizen to do any harm to others. Such a “peaceful” alien hoax would also promise additional gifts of technology, once we had “progressed” to the point where no crazy citizen would have the freedom to use that technology to hurt anyone.

Although most useful idiots would be more likely to believe, and thus more willing to kill, for the invasion story, nearly as many would be just as extreme for the “good alien” story. For example, can you imagine what the crowds of useful idiots would do to any critic of the globalist agenda when the media, the politicians, and the mega churches told them how such critics were holding us back from receiving the additional gifts of alien technology?!

The globalists wouldn’t even have to fight their own fight. One can see how easily they could manipulate hundreds of millions, maybe billions, of useful idiots to fight for their agenda.

I first learned about the idea of an alien hoax to further the globalist agenda from Bill Cooper, which wouldn’t mean anything … except … he was the guy who accurately predicted that something like 9/11 would happen about when it did and that it would be blamed on Osama bin Laden. Of course, we now know that 9/11 was definitely conspiracy. He didn’t have time to develop all the details of an alien hoax that I layout here because they killed him about a month after 9/11.

One might assume the globalists would pull it off just as soon as they believed they could get away with it, but as long as their agenda were progressing, they wouldn’t waste their best false flag unless they saw a window of opportunity closing. For example, what if those internet bloggers started waking up too many people, or what if known technology were catching up to secret technology to such an extent that the hoax would soon become less convincing?

Given that the Vatican has already started preparing people to expect the “peaceful” alien hoax, and given that it would be easier to pull off, I expect it to happen before the invasion hoax, and probably in the 2 – 10 year time frame.

Suppose enough people were not convinced by the “peaceful” alien hoax. In that case, the globalists would have the “peaceful aliens” launch a limited attack to punish a few of those cities having the most non-believers. If that still wasn’t enough, the globalists could have another fake alien race try to exterminate us for being so uncooperative, but then the “peaceful” aliens who had already punished a few non-believing cities could claim that we were worth saving and defeat the bad aliens. Imagine how greatful everyone would be. Then, surely, enough people would be on board for the globalist agenda.

Suppose the bad aliens used some beams from space. Would you believe it? Consider that governments have been working on such weapons for decades.

Real aliens wouldn’t exterminate us by physically attacking us. They would simply ceate a virus that would kill us. Therefore, the globalists might choose to use a virus, which again is plausible human technology, and claim that they got the vaccine from the good aliens. Of course, the vaccine would also be a eugenics program, and its ill effects would simply be blamed on the original virus, when they were in fact caused by the vaccine.

If there were a real alien involved, consider that he may simply be a passive observer and not one of the perpetrators. Also, consider than one alien is not proof of an invasion. It would be more likely that he were a captured scout and that his technology were being used against his will. At least, any of those scenarios is far more likely than an alien invasion that just happened to occur at the point where the globalists had achieved the ability and the need to pull off such a hoax.

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Animal Rights

If we say that humans have rights, then we can say that animals have rights because when a human mistreats an animal, then that human will have caused himself to be more likely to mistreat humans. He will probably have changed his psychology – and possibly his brain chemistry. He will have thus made himself more of a threat to the rest of us. An additional but lesser reason is that he will have made the animal more of a threat to the rest of us.

Let’s illustrate this phenomenon with a few examples:

Suppose an 18 year old girl has a well behaved dog who loves her and would die for her, and then she starts leaving him alone for 24 hours at a time because she wants to be with her boyfriend. Would you let her babysit your kids? Would you hire her? If her boyfriend had no problem with this, would you let him babysit your kids? Would you hire him?

She either has to accept that she is causing her dog to suffer greatly and let it sadden her greatly and make her feel very guilty, which will make her less attractive to the guys, or else, she has to stop caring, which is something humans can do, but then it becomes much easier to do it to other humans.

If she stops caring, then it becomes easier to occasionally let her dog run out of food and water. Then it becomes easier to completely ignore her dog when he is so glad to see her when she briefly pops into her apartment each day. Then it becomes easier to yell at him and smack him when he jumps on her and barks because he is so glad to see her. Then when he starts chewing up the pillows and furniture, it will be easier for her to open the door and let him run out into the street so that he will get run over.

You knew not to hire her or let her babysit your kids long before it got to this point. Same for her boyfriend.

At any time, even years later, she could still choose to feel the sadness and guilt over what she did and decide to be a different person, but until then, who can trust her?

This is how torturers are created by governments. A guard has to decide if he will feel the sadness and guilt of standing guard at the end of the hall when he hears the sounds at the other end coming from the torture room. If he chooses to stop caring, then it will be easier to guard right outside the door of the torture room. Then it will be easier to guard inside the door. Then it will be easier to hold the instrument tray. Then it will be easier to hand the instruments to the torturer. Then it will be easier to participate in the torture directly. Then it will be easier to become the torturer.

This is probably one of the ways that Obama's DHS manufactures sociopaths, since we already know they torture. Another is the No More Hesitation program, which is where Obama's DHS agents shoot at targets of pregnant women and children in their own homes. Some cops shoot at targets of their own children for this reason. Would you feel safe in the presence of these cops?

Many people who care about rights already know about the Stanford prison experiments and the Milgram experiments in the 1960's where the majority of subjects devolved into sociopaths rather quickly and easily; whereas, the experts of the day had predicted that no more than 3% would devolve that far and fast.

Now that we’ve looked at some examples of this phenomenon, let’s consider what we should do.

If one thinks about these cases ahead of time, then it becomes much easier to resist such character devolution in the future. Therefore, simply failing to learn about such examples is actually the first step of choosing to stop caring.

Although dogs do have real emotions, it is an error to project more human attributes onto the dogs than they actually have. Likewise, people often project more sentience and emotion onto a fetus than it actually has. In fact, some people even project human attributes onto toys and other objects. Although this is an error, it still contributes to one’s character devolution if one feels that one is mistreating a sentient emotional being.

The reality of character devolution is a reason to say that people themselves have rights. Who would want to be in proximity to a single individual who has let his character devolve?

Therefore, if one wants to say that humans have rights, then it also makes sense to think of animals as having rights.

We should indeed say that people have rights because people need to interact with each other in order to thrive, and rights are those fundamental principles that maximize our ability to thrive. Rights must also be compatible with our genetically programmed behavior if we expect them to be the most effective. Clearly, rights are thus a useful but fuzzy concept, like good and evil, and like the legendary vanishing heap.

We should thus pretend that rights exist for people, and for animals too, but should the government punish those who violate rights, given that any government whatsoever will also be a violator of rights and a creator of perverse incentives? Should government also regulate behavior to prevent us from starting down the path of character devolution, which would be before we had actually violated any rights?

If we are not each allowed to make mistakes such as going down the path of character devolution at least once, then how can we ever escape the state of arrested development that plagues our society today? Wouldn't a society based on everything voluntary be better? Wouldn't it be preferable to live in a world of strong role models who have learned from the consequences of their reputation? Wouldn’t it be preferable to live in a world where we could easily find inspiration from art that was itself inspired by deep wisdom and enlightenment?

Sunday, August 7, 2016

Penn Jillette Goes to the Dark Side

Penn Jillette came out as a shill in an interview published August 2nd, 2016 on ReasonTV.

Penn now says that we should focus on likeability in a candidate, but that is the same as asking us to not use our brains and to just focus on the image the media creates for each candidate.

Instead of using our brains to investigate and go where the facts take us, the media, and their masters, would love for us to focus on the image they create for each candidate. For example, the media created the Myth of Obama based on ... nothing. Obama just has to not step out of character, and the media will do all of the attacking and defending for him – for free. They even fabricate dirt on those they don't like while covering up the dirt on Obama, thus leaving Obama looking like a really nice, cool, smart guy ... at least to those who would rather conform than think for themselves; whereas, the media thus force any candidates they don't like to spend a lot of their resources to directly defend themselves and to attack the media, Obama, and other bad guys. Then the media spin such necessary and legitimate self-defense and attacks as petty, mean, racist, and ignorant.

Any smart well-informed libertarian like Penn Jillette knows that likeability is a media fabrication, and yet, he now says we should focus on likeability in a candidate. Penn also adds that Obama is a nice likeable guy, even though he knows that Obama is a creation of the media, and that Obama has killed or ruined the lives of tens of millions, and worsened the lives of hundreds of millions. He also knows that Obama claims the authority to kill or indefinitely detain any American without due process, and that he has already exercised these powers. Penn knows that Obama used the IRS to neutralize grassroots efforts that would have cost him reelection. He has also audited and/or jailed those who embarrass him.

Penn now says that Obama is smarter than pretty much anyone, including Bill Clinton! As an example, he says you will learn something new every 15 minutes in conversation with Obama.

If Obama is so smart, then why does he use a teleprompter more than any previous president, and why did he recently sound like a moron when his teleprompter went out; whereas, when Bill Clinton's teleprompter went out, he went ahead and gave the speech. Without his teleprompter, Obama thought Austrians speak Austrian, that there were 57 states (then corrected himself and said there were 60 states), and that good solutions to our energy problems were overinflating our tires and clean coal.  He even tried to enter the Whitehouse thorough a window that he thought was a door – just like George Bush did. If you read the parts of his books that were not ghost wrutten, you can see what a mediocre mind he has. He was given a Nobel prize for nothing, a degree from Columbia having never attended class, and editorship of the Harvard Law Review having never written anything for it – then or later.

You will learn something new in conversation with Obama every 15 minutes? That sounds pretty unimpressive. Consider that you will learn something new from an average libertarians every 5 minutes.

I have never heard a single intelligent or impressive statement from Obama, except this statement he made in 2006:

Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that ‘‘the buck stops here.’’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.

I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit.

However, after Obama became President, he said he had been wrong, and he recanted his one intelligent statement.

Under Obama, there has been no economic recovery, the lost jobs are still gone, the stock market is just inflation, food stamps are at an all time high, and healthcare has gotten worse.

Given how everything Obama has was given to him, and how he is told by everyone among the seemingly diverse crowd around him how he is The One, and how he seems unaware of smart people and smart ideas outside the mainstream, and how he never has to think about attacking others or defending himself … because his fans, such as the media, do it for him … he would naturally always be in a very positive mood and frequently repeating cool stuff that actual smart people in his crowd told him … unless he had an amazing gift for introspection and independent thought; whereas, he seems to have no introspection or independent thought at all. Obama is thus understandably delusional. Hence I stand by my article from 3/21/2010 Pity Obama.

If Penn knows some reason why Obama is so smart, then why didn’t he tell us? Why was his reasoning so laughable? Also, why would he give up all of his credibility with smart, honest, well-informed, independent thinkers in order to infinitesimally enhance Obama’s credibility with mediocre, low-information, conformists? Why would he help such a bad and powerful man at all – let alone at the cost of his own reputation?

After squandering his whole reputation on Obama, Penn then goes on to say that to be healthy, we should eat nothing from animals, which is the same as saying we should eat like a serf. In addition to recommending that we eat like a serf, he is simply wrong. To be healthy, we should eat lots of animal products. For health advice, go to Dr. Mercola's site.

Penn Jillette is the fourth famous libertarian/voluntaryist whom I have observed to have recently, and suddenly, made such shocking statements that I watched them go from being a libertarian hero to being worse than most other shills. (I recently covered Gary Johnson’s fall.) For example, they started praising some of the worst individuals alive today (i.e. Hillary and Obama), and they started misdirecting us. In a nutshell, they are trying to neutralize us. They are thus worse than most in the mainstream media and politics because they definitely know better; whereas, many "journalists"  and politicians are mostly just stupid and ignorant conformists.

Unfortunately, I have no choice but to assume Penn is some kind of shill if he is telling such huge lies to persuade us to live like a serf, to look up to Obama, to have faith in the system, and most importantly, to look away from what is actually happening – like a magician.

The only thing necessary for the people to win is to shine a light on what is really happening, but given that they are neutralizing any honest leaders, like Penn, we can no longer rely on anyone else to educate us.

In order for the people to win, you don’t have to do much. Just think for yourself, and then educate others. You will then just be one of millions. They would have to do a Stalin-like purge to neutralize most such grassroots efforts, but then they would automatically lose the argument for 100 years – so they won’t do that. You’re safe as long as you think for yourself and educate others.

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Never Johnson

I have been a libertarian since at least 1993, and in 2012, I contributed to the Johnson campaign, and thus, I never would have believed that he could lose my vote, but he just did.

First, consider that, although there are some naïve people in the Libertarian Party, any serious, honest, independent-minded, longtime libertarian knows that under Obama, America is circling the drain, and that Hillary and Obama are evil people who are front men for other evil people, and that Democrats and Republicans both work for the same evil people, who some refer to by one of their main agendas – the New World Order. Their differences are mostly theatre. No well informed libertarian has anything good to say about Hillary or Obama – or either Bush.

Now one can understand how shocked I was by the recent CNN town hall, where the host would say a name and Johnson and Weld would give a concise opinion. When the host said "Barack Obama," Johnson said, "Good guy," and Weld said, "Statesmanlike." ... WTF?! ... Then, when the host said, "Hillary Clinton", Johnson said, "A wonderful public servant," and Johnson said, "Old friend. Nice kid. Knew her in her 20's. We shared an office in the Nixon impeachment. Real bond. Lifelong." ... WTF?!!! ... I instantly new that Weld would have to know that Hillary stood out among the lawyers and politicians on the Nixon impeachment for her unethical behavior.

I thought ... "Maybe this is just some tragically misguided attempt at being positive," but then, when the host said, " Donald Trump," Johnson said that when he was in the Republican party early in the 2012 campaign season, if Trump had become the Republican nominee, then he would not have supported Trump. Weld simply said, "Huckster." ... sooo ... nope ... They weren't being positive.

Then, Johnson and weld were interviewed by Reason TV, and to summarize, Medicaid needs to GIVE poor people the same healthcare policy that Johnson got as a state governor. He expects the rest of us to pay for that, and he also expects us to repay the bankers who printed 20 trillion out of thin air and gave it to the federal government. He also says that life in America is better than EVER because we get along better, kids are smarter, law enforcement is better, and business is better – all of which is false!

In a later interview, Johnson said he supports the TPP, but we don’t even need to know any such specifics to say Never Johnson because he has so clearly sold out, which means that no matter what he would do as President, the net effect would be unhealthy for the voters – because that is the whole point of selling out.

Regardless of what these guys have said and done before, they are clearly NWO shills now ... as if their lives depended on it ...

Saturday, May 14, 2016

America’s Founding Principles Can Save Us

We are being played, which is why the players suppress the principles that can save us, which are the founding principles of America.

America's founding principles are being suppressed because they are a direct threat to the most powerful people in America and the world.

Americas founders did not themselves fully understand or articulate the principles that motivated them. For this reason, and for reasons of pragmatism and expediency, the Constitution is an imperfect implementation of America's founding principles. The Articles of Confederation were a more accurate implementation.

A more perfect articulation of America's founding principles is:

Everything Voluntary.
Do not initiate force.
Fight words with words and never with force.
Fight ideas with ideas and never with force.
An idea can always be challenged.

If there be law,
Then, 
Law can only be by the consent of the governed.
And,
No man is above the law.
And,
Secession is a right.

Every man owns himself.
And thus,
Every man has a right to defend himself with lethal force.
And,
Every man owns the fruits of his labor.
And thus,
Every man has a right to trade the fruits of his labor.
And,
No man has a right to the fruits of another man's labor.

A man can only survive by the fruits of his labor.
And thus,
Every man has the right to use lethal force to resist any threat to the fruits of his labor.

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Global Warming – Carbon Disproved

We have two easy ways to disprove the central claim of global warming alarmists, who claim that there is a very strong correlation between CO2 and global temperature, and that CO2 has thus been the cause of the recent warming, and that the warming will thus begin increasing at an alarming degree starting in the year 2000.

Proof #1 – No correlation over 600 million years

As we can see in this 600 million year time line, there is no correlation between temperature and CO2. Also, we can see that the earth has usually been 18° F warmer than it is now, and that it has rarely been this cold and hasn’t been colder.

Proof #2 – Perfect correlation with solar activity

In 2015, someone finally got around to publishing a professional peer reviewed study correlating temperature with solar activity since 1880, and we see that temperature correlates perfectly with solar activity.

image_thumb4_thumb1

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

The Tragedy of the Minimum Wage

An increasing percentage of adults of average intelligence are making at or near the minimum wage, which is a tragedy from any perspective, and thus a popular solution today is to double the minimum wage.

Bernie Sanders is the Presidential candidate promising to double the minimum wage. He says it’s because he really cares about people, and because people have a right to a living wage, and because it would strengthen the economy by enlarging the middle class, which would thus increase consumer spending.

Imagine if Bernie Sanders won and implemented his ideas. Then, if a 30 year old man had been making minimum wage and it were suddenly doubled, he could afford to marry a woman who was making minimum wage, and they could afford to have kids.

That example sounds pretty good if we stop thinking at this point, but if we think for ourselves …

It is pretty easy to see that:

  • Bernie Sanders’ positions on economics are nearly identical to those expoused by Barack Obama throughout his entire life, and yet, after Obama has been President for more than 7 years, an ever increasing percentage of adult Americans are doing jobs that pay at or near the minimum wage in most cities. Therefore, Bernie Sanders’ policies as President would be likely to increase the percentage of Americans making at or near minimum wage, and the people who were fooled by Obama are likely to be fooled by Bernie Sanders.
  • The labor of a burger flipper at McDonalds is worth far less than the labor of a doctor, scientist, engineer, or programmer.
  • It is a disgrace for any average man born in America to be flipping burgers at McDonalds … for ANY wage … because it is such a waste of his potential, and thus it would be an atrocity for government or anyone else to pay him to waste his potential, thereby trapping him in such a job.
  • A higher minimum wage would force up prices and wages until eventually inflation will have caused a doubled minimum wage to only buy the same amount of stuff as before.
  • A higher cost of labor would force companies to lay off many workers.
  • A higher cost of labor for simple jobs would make it more cost effective for companies to replace those jobs with automation (software and robotics).
  • Such a sudden increase would cause people to tragically make unsustainable life choices because they would assume that they would remain employed and continue to have twice the buying power as before, but future layoffs and inflation, caused in large part by doubling the minimum wage, would pull the rug out from under them after they had over extended themselves, which would be another atrocity in addition to paying them to waste their potential.
  • By trapping adults in dead end jobs that waste their potential, a doubling of the minimum wage would thus be an atrocity tantamount to the atrocity of perpetrating government dependency on the black community.

For many, allegory will be more clear than abstract reasoning, so let’s consider how the future would unfold for one man, Chris, if Bernie Sanders won the 2016 Presidential election and promptly doubled the minimum wage.

The Life of Chris

Chris graduated from college with a liberal arts degree in 2009, so he had voted for Obama of course, and even though he had been making minimum wage since the beginning of the Obama administration, he voted to reelect Obama because he still believed the media, who were still telling him that Obama was going to fix everything. He still believed the Myth of Obama created by the media.

Chris was flipping burgers at McDonald’s and thus was contributing pretty much nothing to the world, and for this reason, the world was contributing pretty much nothing to Chris.

Since graduation in 2009, Chris had dreamed of making enough money that he could get married and support a family so that his wife could stay at home and raise the kids so they wouldn’t turn out to be little sociopaths. He had seen how well this had worked for his parents and his brother, which is why he wanted to emulate this aspect of his heritage, even though he saw his family as “not smart enough to vote for Obama”. At some level, he also understood that he had also avoided the trap of drug use because of his parents and his brother.

However, by 2016 Chris had declared bankruptcy. He was at the lowest point in his life and had pretty much given up on Obama. He was ready to make the effort to become a computer programmer, like his brother, which he accurately concluded anyone of average intelligence (like his brother) could do at any point in life if he were willing to make the effort.

According to standardized tests, Chris was actually slightly less intelligent than his brother, and thus both were considered average by what Chris called “conservative” testing methods. Whereas, Chris felt with deep conviction that he was actually smarter than his brother because he was more liberal and because all of his friends agreed with him. He could go all day every day and not meet anyone else in Seattle who disagreed with him. He also believed with deep conviction that he was not “misinformed by the media” like his brother because he did not even own a TV.

Therefore, in 2016, Chris, and all of his friends, voted for Bernie Sanders. They refused to vote for Hillary Clinton. They would not be fooled again like they were with Obama who they were beginning to feel must have actually been “some kind of Neocon”.

Although Bernie Sanders won, Chris didn’t know that, like Obama, Bernie Sanders had won in all the states that used electronic voting machines. Also like Obama, Bernie won in some precincts with more than 100%.

Bernie’s election had once again filled Chris with the hope that he had slowly lost throughout the Obama administration. Then, a few weeks after Chris had begun studying computer programming, Bernie Sanders doubled the minimum wage by executive order. He did this in his first week in office and thus suddenly affirmed everything Chris and his friends believed.

Chris was thinking that computer programming was harder than it actually was because he was still a few weeks away from developing the necessary personal discipline. Chris thus decided that it would be very liberating to free himself from the difficulty of becoming a programmer at this time. He could always do it later.

Chris was flipping burgers at McDonalds and was thus contributing pretty much nothing to the world. However, the world was now forced to contribute twice as much to Chris. Somehow it all seemed fair and just to Chris and his friends, and they knew that it was all because Bernie really cared about people, and because they were smart enough to vote for Bernie.

Out of convenience, Chris married a woman who also made the newly doubled minimum wage. Although they did not make as much combined as his brother, they could buy cheap stuff from China and could thus afford to raise a family with the help of free day care from the government. Of course, their kids were raised by daycare and TV, and were thus little sociopaths compared to his brother’s kids.

Chris’ potential, and the potential of his wife, and many of his friends continued to be wasted … but it gets much worse ...

The higher cost of labor then forced many companies to permanently layoff an ever increasing number of minimum wage workers because it was more cost effective to automate the labor of those minimum wage workers. Of course, that caused many new jobs to be created around the world in corresponding skills, such as computer programming. His one libertarian friend, Jim, called it creative destruction, which is why Chris believed with deep conviction that libertarians were stupid people who didn’t care about anyone – except for Jim.

The higher cost of labor also caused inflation, which eroded the extra buying power of the higher minimum wage, so Chris and his wife made twice as much money, but after ten years, everything cost twice as much. By then, he was 40 and becoming a computer programmer was harder, so he postponed it again.

In addition to the damage of inflation, Chris could no longer afford to buy things made in China because Bernie Sanders had imposed a tariff on Chinese products. Bernie claimed that cheaper labor in China was causing American jobs to go overseas. Bernie didn’t know that his higher taxes and heavy regulations were retarding American job growth and innovation. He didn’t know that such policies were a large part of why so many Americans were in minimum wage jobs in the first place. He did not know that freedom is what creates a middle class.

The Chinese government had learned from what once made America great, so they did not reward mediocrity and they did increase freedom. As a result, their people and businesses were thus forced to grow and excel and innovate, which anyone can do, if they must, and thus, products made in China became more expensive and of higher quality than products made in America.

Then Chris’ wife, who had escaped so many previous layoffs, got permanently laid off herself … and commited suicide …

Of his three little sociopaths, one ended up in prison and one died of an overdose, but before further tragedy could strike, the next president (another Democrat) started a war with China because Democrats believe that WWII was good for the economy. Then, like in WWII, all basic necessities were rationed so they could be redirected toward the war effort. Instead of cars and washing machines, people made tanks and bombs, and thus his wife could have gotten a job in a government factory …

His remaining son was drafted of course, but at least he had a job … except … then his son died in battle … and Chris commited suicide … and it was all because Bernie Sanders cared so much about people …

Chris’s friend Jim observed that hundreds of millions around the world died, and that it was those who were most dependent on government. Jim also observed that, perhaps not so coincidentally, this was also the goal of eugenics, which has always been a goal of progressives, and which is thus a goal of the New World Order.

Jim observed that it was almost as if Bernie Sanders were a useful idiot for the NWO.

Then Jim learned that the Federal Reserve was also a large cause of America’s economic problems and that Bernie Sanders had sold out Ron Paul’s “Audit the Fed” bill by introducing an amendment that neutered it.

Perhaps Bernie was not being played by the NWO at all. Perhaps Bernie was one of the players.

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Trump is a Ringer. Hillary is Trump’s Bitch.

Trump could easily run as an independent and cause the Republican to lose, or if he won the nomination, then he could easily throw the election so that Hillary would win. After all, he has been friends with the Clintons for years, and it wouldn’t be the first time a billionaire ran as an independent to ensure a Clinton victory. Why would Trump want to be conservative or libertarian now when he was always more of a Democrat before?

As an independent candidate, Trump could plausibly claim he was simply mad at the Republicans for not treating him fairly. As the Republican candidate, he could plausibly lose by frequently rehashing only 1% of Hillary’s vulnerabilities – just like how every Republican before him has done.

We know we are being played, but we don’t know exactly how yet, and I have been saying from the beginning that the most likely scenario of the many possibilities is that Trump is in the race to ensure a Hillary victory.

A few months ago, Trump’s advisor, Roger Stone, went on a tour for his devastating and popular new book, “The Clinton’s War on Women.” No one who reads it could vote for Hillary, but is that Trump trying to win, or is that Trump playing Hillary because she would then know she could only win on Trump’s terms.

Perhaps the most incriminating evidence of all is that Trump wouldn’t like doing the job of the President; whereas, Hillary would LOVE doing the job, and thus Trump could be doing what he likes most while knowing the President of the United states was his bitch.

I missed the previous opportunity for such a prediction. Two days before Scalia’s murder, I was thinking I should write about how if it looked like the next President might not be a Democrat or Neocon (Republican Progressive), then they would try to murder one of the conservative judges before Obama leaves, and how that would most likely be Scalia. Ironically, Scalia’s murder is thus the only evidence that Trump may not be in it to ensure a Hillary victory, although it is more likely they were just too impatient to wait for Scalia to die naturally.

On the other hand, the establishment media are not trying nearly as hard as they could to knock Trump out, so maybe Trump is actually the most favored torch carrier for the establishment. He has certainly been a crony of government – by his own admission – for a long time.

Like I said, we know we are being played, but we just don’t know exactly how – yet.